Home Multi-Country Search About Admin Login
Cenozoic
Cretaceous
Jurassic
Triassic
Permian
Carboniferous
Devonian
Early Paleozoic

Search by
Select Region(s) to search
Hold Ctrl (Windows/Linux) or Command (Mac) to select multiple
Yanbu Formation
Click to display on map of the Ancient World at:
Yanbu Fm base reconstruction

Yanbu Fm


Period: 
Neogene

Age Interval: 
Aquitanian, Sa3


Province: 
Red Sea (Saudi Arabia)

Type Locality and Naming

Middle unit of the Tayran Gr . Hughes and Filatoff (1995) named the Yanbu Formation for a subsurface succession of evaporites in the Yanbu region of western Saudi Arabia. The Yanbu Formation is defined in the Saudi Aramco exploration well Yanbu-6 (YNBU-6: 24°06′54.0″N, 38°08′59.0″E) between 2,684–3,145 ft (461 ft, 140.5 m thick), onshore coastal Saudi Arabian Red Sea. Column: Red Sea Saudi Arabia (although present only in a small part of it.). Middle formation in Tayran Gr

Synonym:


Lithology and Thickness

Evaporite - halite and/or anhydrite with minor shale.


Lithology Pattern: 
Halite


Relationships and Distribution

Lower contact

Regionally, the schematic strat column indicates the next older unit as Al Wajh Fm. In the subsurface, the Yanbu Fm consists of anhydrite and halite that conformably overlie the Al Wajh Fm siliciclastics and in places are interbedded with them.

Upper contact

Regionally, the adjusted schematic strat column for graphic purposes would assign the next younger unit as Musayr Fm. However, these are largely coeval. "In a normal sequence, the Yanbu Fm is interpreted to be unconformably overlain by the Burqan Fm, based on the dramatic paleoenvironmental contrast between the shallow, restricted Tayran Gr and the deep-marine Burqan Fm sediments. Exposures in the Midyan region also provide evidence for this unconformity." (Hughes and Johnson, 2005)

Regional extent

Localized distribution. The Yanbu Formation is not exposed in the Saudi Arabian Red Sea region. The Yanbu Formation is not exposed along the Red Sea coast, but halite and anhydrite have been penetrated in exploration wells in the Yanbu Basin and to the north in Midyan (Cocker and Hughes, 1993).

The Yanbu Fm is correlated to the Ghara Member of the Nukhul Fm (Saoudi and Khalil, 1984) in the Gulf of Suez and Egyptian Red Sea; and in the subsurface in the Yemeni and Somali Gulf of Aden (Hughes and Beydoun, 1992). (Hughes and Johnson, 2005)


GeoJSON

{"type":"Feature","geometry":{"type":"MultiPolygon","coordinates":[[[[32.99,29.06],[32.36,28.64],[33.44,26.94],[35.21,21.35],[40.02,14.49],[43.03,16.84],[34.87,28.59],[32.99,29.06]]]]}}

Fossils

Palynoflora from the intra-evaporitic sediments include the halophytic pollen Retiperiporites spp. but lack marine indicators; no microfauna are present.


Age 

An early Miocene age is assigned to the Yanbu fm based on its stratigraphic position in the subsurface and its palynoflora, which is similar to that of the Al Wajh Fm. Strontium isotope dating of anhydrite laminae and crystals in a thick halite sequence gave an absolute age of 22–23 Ma (Cocker and Hughes, 1993).. Schematic strat column in Mideast timescale 2008 didn't separate the Yanbu Fm and Musayr Fm, but placed both as early through middle Aquitanian. Therefore, only for graphic purposes, these partly coeval formations are given equal durations in this interval.

Age Span: 

    Beginning stage: 
Aquitanian

    Fraction up in beginning stage: 
0.0

    Beginning date (Ma): 
23.04

    Ending stage: 
Aquitanian

    Fraction up in the ending stage: 
0.35

    Ending date (Ma):  
22.13

Depositional setting

Its localized distribution and often cryptic layering represent precipitation in hypersaline water. The deposition of the Yanbu Formation is probably due to an early restricted marine incursion related to the earliest stage of the opening of the Red Sea. Orszag-Sperber et al. (1992) suggest that the deposition of the evaporites was related to the beginning of the Red Sea rift and to the tectonic control of restricted marine conditions rather than to a fall in sea-level. The purity of the evaporites argues against a sabkha origin and they probably formed in localized hypersaline ponds in a salina setting, although sabkha evaporites may exist locally." (Hughes and Johnson, 2005)


Depositional pattern:  


Additional Information


Compiler:  

Hughes, G.W., Johnson, R.S., 2005. Lithostratigraphy of the Red Sea Region. GeoArabia, 10: 49-126. And Middle East Geological Timescale 2008 Al-Husseini, Journal of Middle East Petroleum Geosciences v 13. no. 4